The Harm Reduction Coalition welcomes organizational sign-ons
to the following letter to Ambassador Randall Tobias. To sign-on, please send
your organization�s name and address to [email protected].
Responses are due byJune 6, 2005 .
More information is available from the Harm Reduction
Coalition at: www.harmreduction.org
***
Ambassador Randall Tobias
Office of the United
States Global AIDS Coordinator
US State Department
2201 C
Street NW
Washington
DC
20522
Dear Ambassador Tobias:
As the
US
increases its
commitment to global HIV prevention efforts, we write to express our concern
about recent reports that US officials have questioned the efficacy of needle
exchange programs and sought to block support for needle exchange in United
Nations resolutions and policy documents. As you know, the sharing of syringes
by injection drug users is a major driver of the AIDS epidemic both in the
United
States
and internationally. As researchers, practitioners and representatives of
affected populations, we affirm the important role that needle exchange and
other sterile syringe programs play in helping to avert the spread of
HIV/AIDS.
Outside of Africa, an estimated
one-third of new HIV infections are attributed to injection drug use. In some
countries, the proportion is even higher. In
Russia, as many
as 1.2 million people are living with HIV, with 75 percent of new infections
stemming from injection drug use. Injection drug use accounts for the majority
of HIV/AIDS cases in
Ukraine, all of
the Baltic States, the
Central
Asian
Republics,
Indonesia,
Nepal,
Iran, and
Pakistan. In
China,
Vietnam and
Malaysia, the
majority of those living with HIV are injection drug users. Often, the vast
majority of those infected are under thirty. Injection driven HIV epidemics
consistently spread faster than sexually transmitted epidemics such as those
found in sub-Saharan Africa.
In the
United
States
, according to the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 23 percent of new AIDS cases reported in 2003 were
attributed to injection drug use and/or sex with an injection drug user. This
percentage is higher for women and African American men. Of all cases diagnosed
through 2003, 53 percent of cases among women and 43 percent among African
American men were attributed to injection drug use or sex with an injection drug
user.
As the US Public Health Service has noted, for injection drug
users who cannot or will not stop using drugs, using sterile syringes remains
the safest and most effective method of HIV prevention. Medically appropriate
treatment remains out of reach to the vast majority of drug users who need it:
in the
United
States
, one of the world's richest countries,
over 80 percent of those needing treatment for drug abuse as of 2000, did not
have access to it. At the same time, extensive evaluation and research has shown
that sterile syringe programs can dramatically decrease the spread of HIV
without increasing drug use. These programs can additionally provide a bridge to
drug treatment services by offering clients with information and referrals to
treatment providers. No fewer than seven federally-funded reviews and reports
conducted by public health officials, researchers and US government agencies
have concluded that syringe exchange programs are effective, safe and cost
effective.
The efficacy of syringe exchange has recently been affirmed
by the
US
government's top scientists. In an October 7, 2004 letter to Congress, Director
of the National Institutes of Health Dr. Elias Zerhouni stated, "Research shows
that SEPs [syringe exchange programs], when implemented as part of a
comprehensive HIV/AIDS prevention strategy, can be an effective public health
approach to reduce the spread of HIV and other blood borne pathogens in the
community." In an
August 4, 2004 letter, Director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse Dr.
Nora Volkow stated, "The majority of studies have shown that NEPs/SEPs [needle
exchange programs/syringe exchange programs] are strongly associated with
reductions in the spread of HIV when used as a component of comprehensive
approach to HIV prevention... In addition to decreasing HIV infected needles in
circulation through the physical exchange of syringes, most NEPs/SEPs are part
of a comprehensive HIV prevention effort that may include education on risk
reduction, and referral to drug addiction treatment, job or other social
services, and these interventions may be responsible for a significant part of
the overall effectiveness of NEPs/SEPs. NEPs/SEPs also provide an opportunity to
reach out to populations that are often difficult to engage in treatment."
In 2004, this consensus was reinforced by the World Health
Organization (WHO), which stated that the available data "present a compelling
case that needle and syringe programs substantially and cost effectively reduce
the spread of HIV among injection drug users and do so without evidence of
exacerbating injecting drug use at either the individual or societal level." The
WHO accordingly recommended that "authorities responsible for areas threatened
by or experiencing an epidemic of HIV infection among IDUs (injection drug
users) should adopt measures urgently to increase the availability and
utilization of sterile injecting equipment and expand implementation to scale as
soon as possible."
As the single largest funder of global HIV/AIDS programs in
the world, the
US carries
enormous influence in shaping global approaches to the epidemic. Even beyond its
role as a donor, many look to the United States for guidance in the design and
implementation of their programs. The fact that the
United
States
remains the only country in the world to impose an explicit ban on federal
funding of needle exchange already sets a poor example to other nations battling
severe injection-driven HIV/AIDS epidemics. It is more critical than ever that
US agencies
communicate accurate information about needle exchange, faithfully represent the
public health consensus supporting these programs, and refrain from standing in
the way of countries, and organizations within its own borders, that wish to
pursue this proven, effective method of prevention. With so many at risk for
HIV, we need all the tools we have.
Sincerely,
Access Works, Minneapolis,
MN
Advocates for Recovery through Medicine, MI
African Action, Washington,
DC
African Services Committee, New York, NY
After Hours Project,
Brooklyn,
NY
AIDS
Center of
Queens
County,
Queens,
NY
AIDS Foundation of Chicago,
Chicago,
IL
AIDS Mastery Fund, New York,
NY
AIDS Services of Austin,
Austin,
TX
AIDS Treatment Activists Coalition, New
York, NY
American
Academy of HIV Medicine,
Washington,
DC
American Jewish World Service, New York, NY
Americans for Safe Access,
Oakland,
CA
amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research,
New
York,
NY
Bailey House, New York,
NY
Beth Israel Medical Center,
New York, NY
Bexar Area Harm Reduction Coalition, San
Antonio, TX
Center for Health and Gender Equity,
Takoma
Park,
MD
CHAMP, New York,
NY
Chicago Recovery
Alliance,
Chicago,
IL
CitiWide Harm Reduction,
Bronx,
NY
Crane
Center, Santa
Clara Public Health Dept, Santa Clara, CA
Dora Weiner Foundation, Staten Island, NY
Douglas
County HCV Task Force,
Roseburg,
OR
Drug Overdose Prevention and Education Project,
San
Francisco,
CA
Drug Policy Alliance,
New York, NY
Foundation for Integrative AIDS Research,
Brooklyn,
NY
Foundation for Research of Sexually Transmitted Diseases,
New York,
NY
Global AIDS
Alliance,
Washington
DC
Gay Men's Health Crisis, New York, NY
Harm Reduction Coalition, New York, NY
Harm Reduction Project, Salt Lake City, UT
Harm Reduction Psychotherapy and Training Associates,
New
York,
NY
Health Gap (Global Access Project),
Washington,
DC
Health Initiatives for Youth, San Francisco, CA
HIV Advocacy Council of
Oregon & SW Washington, Portland,
OR
HIV
Resource
Center,
Roseburg,
OR
HIV/HCV Committee of
California Prison Focus,
San Francisco,
CA
Housing Works, New York,
NY
Human Rights Watch, New York,
NY
Interfaith Drug Policy Initiative,
Washington,
DC
International Community of Women Living with HIV/AIDS,
Washington,
DC
Intersect-Worldwide, New York, NY
Jovenes 24 Hrs A.D., New York, NY
JRI Health, Boston,
MA
League of Pissed Off Voters, New York, NY
Lower East Side Harm Reduction Center, New York,
NY
Marin Services for Women,
Greenbrae,
CA
Michigan
Positive Action Coalition (MI-POZ), Detroit,
Michigan
National Advocates for Pregnant Women,
New
York,
NY
National Alliance
of State & Territorial AIDS Directors,
Washington,
DC
National Association of People with AIDS (NAPWA-US),
Washington,
DC
National Development and Research Institutes,
New
York,
NY
National
Lawyers
Guild-Loyola New Orleans School of Law
Chapter, New
Orleans,
LA
Network of Sex Work Projects, New York, NY
New Mexico AIDS
Service, Albuquerque,
NM
New York
Academy of Medicine,
New
York,
NY
North American Syringe Exchange Network,
Tacoma,
WA
Open Society Institute, New York, NY
Pangaea Global AIDS Foundation, San
Francisco, CA
PartySmart, Northern NM Chapter of
Dancesafe, Los Alamos,
NM
Physicians for Human Rights,
Cambridge,
MA
Physicians for Human Rights,
Washington,
DC
Points of Distribution,
Oakland,
CA
Positive Health Project, New York, NY
Presbyterian Church
(USA)
Washington Office,
Washington,
DC
Priority Africa Network,
Berkeley,
CA
Project Inform, San Francisco, CA
Public Citizen's Health Research Group,
Washington,
DC
Roseburg Risk
Reduction, Roseburg,
OR
Roseburg
VA
Medical
Center,
Roseburg,
OR
San Antonio AIDS
Foundation, San
Antonio,
TX
San Francisco
AIDS Foundation, San
Francisco,
CA
San Mateo AIDS
Program, San Mateo,
CA
Southern Tier AIDS Program, Johnson City, NY
Student for Sensible Drug Policy,
Washington,
DC
Test Positive Aware Network,
Chicago,
IL
Title II Community AIDS National Network,
New
York,
NY
Treatment Action Group,
New York,
NY
Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations,
Boston,
MA
United Church of
Christ,
Cleveland,
OH
Utah AIDS
Foundation, Salt Lake City,
UT
Vermont Harm
Reduction Coalition, VT